Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The (133)Cs magic-angle spinning NMR spectra of the paramagnetic compounds CsM(II)[M(III)(CN)6], M(II) = Ni, Co, Fe, Mn; M(II) = Co, Fe, yield unusually large and temperature-dependent signal shifts (up to -950 ppm relative to CsCl at 298 K). Comparison with the spectra of the diamagnetic analogues CsM[Co(CN)6], M = Zn, Cd, shows that the shifts are largely due to the unpaired electrons. This is ascribed to through-bond transfer of spin to the Cs(+) ions, while the through-space effect of the magnetic moments on the signal shifts is shown to be virtually negligible. The mechanism inducing negative spin at Cs(+) is discussed. The magnitude of the spin density (average: |5.8 × 10(-3)| (a.u.) (-3)) suggests that Cs(+) is involved in magnetic exchange interactions of corresponding Prussian blue derivatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Köhler et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: