Why the study?
Do adolescent girls with menstrual irregularities have higher rates of PCOS and insulin resistance compared to those without?
Do adolescent girls with menstrual irregularities have higher rates of PCOS and insulin resistance compared to those without?
Adolescents with persistent menstrual irregularities frequently have PCOS and elevated insulin resistance, indicating a higher risk for metabolic syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adolescents with menstrual irregularities may warrant PCOS evaluation; cross-sectional data leave open prospective metabolic risks.
The perimenarcheal onset of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) has long been recognized, through both its pathophysiology and the frequent onset of hirsutism and menstrual irregularities in this age group. However, there is often a delay in diagnosing PCOS in adolescence because menstrual irregularity is frequently thought to be normal in the first 2 or 3 years after menarche, particularly if clinical signs of hyperandrogenism such as hirsutism or acne are mild or absent. This was a Cross-sectional Study consisting of 102 adolescent girls, aged 12 to 19 years, selected from patients attending the Gynecology Outpatient Clinic. In present study, level of insulin resistance along with markers of PCOS was assessed and compared in adolescent women with (cases) or without (controls) menstrual irregularities, a hall mark of PCOS. 18(35.29%) cases versus 01(1.96%) controls the Rotterdam criteria of PCOS. Clinical manifestations of hyper androgenism were not yet present in all cases who met Rotterdam criteria of PCOS, suggesting menstrual irregularity, especially oligomenorrhoea (83.3% of all PCOS (cases), as the most precocious marker of PCOS. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with persistent menstrual irregularities 2 years after menarche frequently have PCOS and elevated HOMA-IR values than controls, indicating a high probability of developing insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome later in life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumari et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: