Why the study?
Relationships between SES and health are questioned due to a lack of true experiments, and biological and SES mechanisms explaining gender differences are rarely examined simultaneously.
Does lifetime socioeconomic adversity associate with physiological dysregulation in a national sample of twins?
Does lifetime socioeconomic adversity associate with physiological dysregulation in a national sample of twins?
The association between socioeconomic adversity and physiological health appears independent of genetic and shared environmental influences in men, but not in women.
Remains hypothesis-generating regarding socioeconomic and gender influences on physiological health; leaves open the need.
BACKGROUND: A large literature demonstrates associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and health, including physiological health and well-being. Moreover, gender differences are often observed among measures of both SES and health. However, relationships between SES and health are sometimes questioned given the lack of true experiments, and the potential biological and SES mechanisms explaining gender differences in health are rarely examined simultaneously. PURPOSE: To use a national sample of twins to investigate lifetime socioeconomic adversity and a measure of physiological dysregulation separately by sex. METHODS: Using the twin sample in the second wave of the Midlife in the United States survey (MIDUS II), biometric regression analysis was conducted to determine whether the established SES-physiological health association is observed among twins both before and after adjusting for potential familial-level confounds (additive genetic and shared environmental influences that may underly the SES-health link), and whether this association differs among men and women. RESULTS: Although individuals with less socioeconomic adversity over the lifespan exhibited less physiological dysregulation among this sample of twins, this association only persisted among male twins after adjusting for familial influences. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the present study suggest that, particularly for men, links between socioeconomic adversity and health are not spurious or better explained by additive genetic or early shared environmental influences. Furthermore, gender-specific role demands may create differential associations between SES and health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinette et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: