Why the study?
The study analyzed direct and sequential venous conduits in the long-term period after coronary artery bypass surgery.
Does the use of sequential venous grafts improve long-term functional viability compared to direct venous grafts in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Does the use of sequential venous grafts improve long-term functional viability compared to direct venous grafts in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Sequential venous grafts demonstrate superior long-term angiographic patency compared to direct venous grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting, particularly for smaller target vessels.
Sequential venous grafts showed higher patency than direct ones in this observational series; leaves open whether conduit choice should change without randomized confirmation.
Objective. To analyze direct and sequential venous conduits in long-term period after coronary artery bypass surgery. Material and methods. We analyzed coronary angiography data in 258 patients operated on between 2015 and 2020. Inclusion criterion was coronary artery bypass grafting with direct or sequential venous conduits excluding left anterior descending artery. We assessed 505 direct and 124 sequential grafts. The long-term results of coronary artery bypass surgery and major anatomical and topographic coronary factors influencing functional viability of venous conduits were analyzed. Results. Satisfactory function of conduits regardless the type of the graft was observed in 79.3% of cases, dysfunction — in 3.1% of cases, occlusion — in 17.6% of cases. Functional viability of direct grafts was significantly lower compared to sequential grafts (78.4 vs. 83.1%, p<0.05). Sequential conduits are more preferable for coronary arteries >1.5 mm and ≤1.5 mm (88.5 vs. 82.0% (for arteries >1.5 mm) and 76.6 vs. 63.2% (for arteries ≤1.5 mm), p<0.05). Function of different conduits does not depend on coronary artery pool. Conclusion. Sequential anastomoses are preferred for revascularization of arteries <1.5 mm. One should consider that state of bypassed coronary artery determines patency of the conduit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pankov et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery