Key result
Multi-arterial grafting is a safe procedure for myocardial revascularization, as choice of conduit was not a predictor of operative mortality or morbidity by multivariate analysis.
Why the study?
Does multi-arterial grafting compared to single arterial or venous grafting affect operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization?
Population
3,062 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization (CABG)
Comparison
Myocardial revascularization with two or more… vs Single internal mammary artery ± veins or only…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
Operative (perioperative)
Authors
Loading...
Supports multi-arterial grafting safety in selected patients; leaves open randomized confirmation of outcomes.
Cohort (n=3,062)
Does multi-arterial grafting compared to single arterial or venous grafting affect operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization?
p-value: p=<0.001
Multi-arterial grafting is a safe and efficacious procedure for myocardial revascularization in carefully selected patients, without independently increasing operative mortality or morbidity compared to conventional conduits.
Rizzo et al. (1998) conducted a cohort in Myocardial revascularization (n=3,062). Multi-arterial grafting (two or more arterial conduits) vs. Single internal mammary artery ± veins, or only saphenous vein conduits was evaluated on Operative mortality (p=<0.001). Multi-arterial grafting is a safe procedure for myocardial revascularization, as choice of conduit was not a predictor of operative mortality or morbidity by multivariate analysis.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: