Why the study?
Although SGLT2 inhibitors provide cardioprotective benefits in heart failure, their specific impact on arrhythmias remains incompletely understood.
Do SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in patients enrolled in long-term RCTs?
Do SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in patients enrolled in long-term RCTs?
SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter compared to placebo, but do not impact ventricular arrhythmias or sinus bradycardia.
SGLT2 inhibitors lower AF/AFL risk without affecting ventricular arrhythmias; extends cardioprotective benefits to arrhythmia prevention in cardiometabolic disease.
Aims Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are novel oral hypoglycemic agents strongly endorsed in the treatment guidelines for heart failure due to their cardioprotective benefits. However, their specific impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on arrhythmias incompletely understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the long-term effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on various arrhythmia types. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception to 30 June 2024, to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) with a follow-up duration of at least 52 weeks. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL), and the secondary outcomes included ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), and sinus bradycardia. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the incidence of arrhythmias. Results Thirty-nine RCTs involving 107,770 participants were included. The results of meta-analysis revealed that patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors had a reduced risk of AF/AFL compared with placebo (RR 0.86; 95%CI, 0.77–0.95; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the risk of AF/AFL between the high-dose SGLT2 inhibitors group and the low-dose SGLT2 inhibitors group (RR 0.78; 95%CI, 0.60–1.02; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.07), although a decreasing trend in the high-dose group was noted. Similarly, no significant differences were found for VT (RR 0.99; 95%CI, 0.81–1.22; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.96), VF (RR 1.06; 95%CI, 0.73–1.54; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.75) or sinus bradycardia (RR 1.12; 95%CI, 0.57–2.18; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.74) between the SGLT2 inhibitors and placebo groups. Conclusion SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduce the risk of AF/AFL but have no notable impact on the risk of VT, VF, and sinus bradycardia. Additionally, different doses of SGLT2 inhibitors did not statistically influence AF/AFL incidence. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/home , identifier PROSPERO:CRD42022371089
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: