Why the study?
There is currently no clear consensus regarding the optimal DAPT strategy after CABG, prompting an evaluation of the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel.
Does aspirin plus ticagrelor reduce mortality and adverse cardiovascular events compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients post-CABG?
Does aspirin plus ticagrelor reduce mortality and adverse cardiovascular events compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients post-CABG?
In patients post-CABG, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor significantly reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to aspirin and clopidogrel, without increasing major bleeding.
Supports ticagrelor-based DAPT post-CABG for reduced mortality without excess bleeding; leaves open need for confirmatory RCTs.
Background Following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the standard treatment regimen typically involves dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which includes a P2Y12 receptor antagonist in combination with aspirin. There is currently no clear consensus regarding the optimal DAPT strategy after CABG. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients post-CABG. Methods A meta-analysis of eligible studies of patients undergoing CABG and receiving either aspirin plus clopidogrel (A + C) or aspirin plus ticagrelor (A + T) as antiplatelet therapy, was carried out. The outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), major bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, saphenous vein occlusion and total graft occlusion. Results 4 randomized controlled trials and 3 observational studies ( n = 2,424) were eligible for final analysis. A + T was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.31–0.70, p < 0.001, p heterogeneity = 0.80, I 2 = 0%) and cardiovascular mortality (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.31–0.82, p = 0.006, p heterogeneity = 0.71, I 2 = 0%), compared with A + C group. No statistically significant difference was found in the rates of major bleeding (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.69–1.96; p = 0.57; p heterogeneity = 0.26; I 2 = 23%) between two groups. Besides, the rates of MACCEs, myocardial infarction, stroke, total graft occlusion, revascularization and saphenous vein occlusion were comparable between two groups ( p > 0.05). Conclusions The meta-analysis presented the evidence supporting the use of A + T post-CAVG in reducing all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, with no increase in bleeding events, in comparison with A + C. Additional RCTs are needed to determine the optimal DAPT after CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: