Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper addresses the question why inherently low-productive perennials dominate the vegetation in nutrient-poor habitats despite the higher productivity of inherently high-productive perennials at all levels of nutrient availability. A simple model is presented about the biomass and nutrient dynamics of two perennials with an equal nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), but with different values for the components of NUE (A: nutrient productivity; and MRT: the mean residence time of nutrients in the plant). It is assumed that growth is nutrient-limited. This model shows that low-productive, nutrient-conserving species (low A, high MRT) attain at a given level of nutrient availability a higher equilibrium biomass than high-productive species with higher nutrient loss rates (high A, low MRT)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aerts et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: