Why the study?
Does a 12-month twice-weekly combined aerobic and resistance exercise program improve cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, and heart rate response in sedentary women across different age groups?
Does a 12-month twice-weekly combined aerobic and resistance exercise program improve cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, and heart rate response in sedentary women across different age groups?
While combined exercise training improves fitness and strength across all ages in women, exercise-induced improvements in heart rate recovery may be blunted in late middle-aged and older women.
The aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of age on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), muscle strength and heart rate (HR) response to exercise adaptation in women in response to a long-term twice-weekly combined aerobic and resistance exercise program. 85 sedentary women, divided into young (YG; n=22, 30.3 ± 6.2 years), early middle-aged (EMG; n=28, 44.1 ± 2.5 years), late middle-aged (LMG; n=20, 56.7 ± 3.5 years) and older (OG; n=15, 71.4 ± 6.9 years) groups, had their CRF, muscle strength (1-repetition maximum test) and HR response to exercise (graded exercise test) measured before and after 12 months of combined exercise training. Exercise training improved CRF and muscle strength in all age groups (P<0.05), and no significant differences were observed between groups. Exercise training also improved resting HR and recovery HR in YG and EMG (P<0.05), but not in LMG and OG. Maximal HR did not change in any group. Combined aerobic and resistance training at a frequency of 2 days/week improves CRF and muscle strength throughout the lifespan. However, exercise-induced improvements in the HR recovery response to exercise may be impaired in late middle-aged and older women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciolac et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: