Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors compared the long-term recovery of sutured facial nerves after the removal of 8 neurofibromatosis-2 (NF2)-associated and 22 non-NF2 acoustic neuromas. The patients were from a series of 270 patients operated on for an acoustic neuroma between 1979 and 1989. The assessment was done with a modified House and Brackmann scale from video recordings. At least some facial movement or tone was achieved (Grade 5 or better) in all but three patients, but in none was the recovery excellent. The facial function, judged by the overall appearance in movement, recovered less in patients with NF2 (P = 0.048); a moderately good recovery (Grade 3 or better) was seen in one patient of eight with NF2, as compared with 13 of 22 with non-NF2. In conclusion, if the tumor cannot be peeled off easily from the facial nerve in patients with NF2, leaving a fragment of tumor behind is preferable to cutting and suturing the facial nerve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blomstedt et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: