Although Global Climate Models (GCMs) are regarded as the best tools available for future climate projections, there are biases in simulating precipitation and temperature due to their coarse spatial resolution and cannot be used directly to assess the impact of projected climate change. The study objective was to investigate how bias correction methods impact the modelled future climate change under Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) for 2020 -2050 .Reanalysisdata (1980 -2000) ) and bias correction approaches (change factor [CF], nudging and Quantile Mapping [QM]) were used to calibrate GCMs [GFDL-ESM2M, MIROC-MIROC5, MPI-ESM-MR, and NCAR-CCSM4] data under RCP8.5 scenarios (2020-2050) for Mount Makulu, Zambia (latitude: 15.550 S, longitude: 28.250 E, altitude: 1200 m). Bias correcti on methods enable the comparison of observed
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chisanga et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: