Why the study?
With increasing AF presentations to the ED, emergency clinicians require knowledge of evidence-based rate and rhythm control strategies for patient stabilization and complication prevention.
This review provides an overview of evidence-based rate and rhythm control strategies for managing atrial fibrillation in the emergency department.
ED clinicians need updated AF strategies; review leaves optimal protocols open for prospective study.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common dysrhythmias managed in the ED and accounts for more than half a million visits a year in the United States. More than 6 out of 10 of these visits result in admissions. As the prevalence of AF has continued to increase in recent years, so has the presentation of patients with AF to the ED. For these reasons, clinicians in emergency settings must be knowledgeable of evidence-based rate and rhythm control strategies for stabilizing patients and preventing complications. This article discusses options, indications, contraindications, and safe implementation of rate and rhythm control strategies for ED clinicians. Recent studies have suggested that early rhythm control may benefit newly diagnosed patients, reducing stroke risk, cardiovascular deaths, and disease progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Акопян et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: