Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines Korean language teachers generative AI literacy and competence development within a technology acceptance framework. Drawing on survey data from 156 teachers, the study analyzes usage patterns and the perceptual structure underlying AI integration. Although 75.6% reported monthly use, engagement remained largely introductory, centered on text-based material production. Exploratory factor analysis identified three latent dimensions: perceived instrumental utility, perceived educational effectiveness, and usage self-efficacy (cumulative variance: 74.4%). One-way ANOVA revealed that perceived instrumental utility and self-efficacy varied significantly by proficiency level, while perceived educational effectiveness remained stable across groups, functioning as a pre-formed normative belief independent of experience. Multiple regression analysis indicated that perceived instrumental utility most strongly predicted teachers intention to develop AI competence (β=.494, p<.001, R²=.303). These findings suggest that sustainable AI integration in Korean language education depends less on cultivating abstract educational value beliefs than on enabling teachers to experience immediate, practical utility—making hands-on, context-specific training the most effective entry point for competence development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seungjoo Baek (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: