Why the study?
Stress is a significant trigger in cardiovascular disease, and heart rate variability reflects autonomic function and predicts cardiovascular mortality, making the impact of stress-reducing interventions on heart rate variability pertinent to explore.
Do stress-reducing interventions improve heart rate variability in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Do stress-reducing interventions improve heart rate variability in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Stress-reducing interventions significantly improve heart rate variability parameters in patients with cardiovascular disease, suggesting a potential mechanism for improved outcomes.
Stress-reducing interventions improve HRV in CVD; extends trial evidence supporting autonomic-targeted adjunctive strategies.
Stress is recognized as a significant trigger and exacerbator of various medical conditions, particularly in the field of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Given that heart rate variability (HRV) offers insight into the functioning of the autonomic nervous system and has been identified as a predictive factor for increased cardiovascular mortality, exploring the correlation between stress and HRV is pertinent. We systematically reviewed trials where researchers investigated the effects of stress-reducing interventions on biomarkers and time-domain/frequency-domain parameters of HRV in CVD. Eligible studies underwent meta-analysis utilizing a random-effects model. The meta-analysis showed overall beneficial effects of stress-reducing interventions on HRV for the standard deviation of Normal-to-Normal intervals (SDNN) in short-term and 24 h assessments, as well as for the low-frequency power (LF) in short-term assessment. Overall effect sizes were notably high and showed significant p-values (short-term SDNN: MD = 6.43, p = 0.01; 24 h SDNN: MD = 10.92, p = 0.004; short-term LF: MD = 160.11, p < 0.001). Our findings highlight the significant impact of stress-reducing interventions in modulating HRV by influencing short-term SDNN and LF parameters, as well as the 24 h assessment of SDNN. These results emphasize the importance of stress-reducing measures in lowering the risk of further progression in CVD and improving patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El-Malahi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: