Four and one half months into the intifadeh, the uprising in Israel and the occupied territories, Nightline presented a five‐part series which attempted to provide a context for the narratives surrounding and fueling the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. This paper analyzes how Nightline's structural choices privileged a particular reading of the conflict and belied their overt effort to let the participants tell their own story. Koppel took local narratives which gave shape to cross‐cultural conflict and forced a rereading of the events through his authoritative voice, interview interventions, and editing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collins et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: