Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The relation between epidemiological research results and policy-ma king is reviewed. Apparently, traditional models of policy-making (incrementalism, mixed scanning synoptic planning) do not explain why research findings are hardly used in policy-making procedures. It is suggested that this phenomenon is related to three determinants of policy-making: (i) a bias stemming from sets of causal, final and normative assumptions and presuppositions; (ii) interest webs of groups in certain domains; and (iii) the power of organizations to monitor and communicate. The conclusion is that epidemiologists should engage in the policy-making process more consciously and conscientiously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
EVELYNE DELEEUW (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: