Why the study?
Does the Prostate-Health-Index (PHI) predict pathological outcome and biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy?
Does the Prostate-Health-Index (PHI) predict pathological outcome and biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy?
The Prostate Health Index (PHI) is a valuable independent biomarker for predicting pathological outcomes and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Supports using this biomarker for preoperative risk stratification in prostate cancer; leaves open whether its routine integration improves long.
// Andreas Maxeiner 1 , Ergin Kilic 2 , Julia Matalon 1 , Frank Friedersdorff 1 , Kurt Miller 1 , Klaus Jung 1,3 , Carsten Stephan 1,3 and Jonas Busch 1 1 Department of Urology, Charité, Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany 2 Department of Pathology, Charité, Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany 3 Berlin Institute for Urologic Research, Berlin, Germany Correspondence to: Andreas Maxeiner, email: // Keywords : prostate cancer; biomarker; prostate health index; prostate-specific antigen; biochemical recurrence Received : January 30, 2017 Accepted :April 15, 2017 Published : April 27, 2017 Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the Prostate-Health-Index (PHI) for pathological outcome prediction following radical prostatectomy and also for biochemical recurrence prediction in comparison to established parameters such as Gleason-score, pathological tumor stage, resection status (R0/1) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Out of a cohort of 460 cases with preoperative PHI-measurements (World Health Organization calibration: Beckman Coulter Access-2-Immunoassay) between 2001 and 2014, 437 patients with complete follow up data were included. From these 437 patients, 87 (19.9%) developed a biochemical recurrence. Patient characteristics were compared by using chi-square test. Predictors were analyzed by multivariate adjusted logistic and Cox regression. The median follow up for a biochemical recurrence was 65 (range 3-161) months. PHI, PSA, [-2]proPSA, PHI- and PSA-density performed as significant variables (p < 0.05) for cancer aggressiveness: Gleason-score <7 or ≥7 (ISUP grade 1 or ≥2) . Concerning pathological tumor stage discrimination and prediction, variables as PHI, PSA, %fPSA, [-2]proPSA, PHI- and PSA-density significantly discriminated between stages <pT3 and ≥pT3 with the highest AUC (0.7) for PHI. In biochemical recurrence prediction PHI, PSA, [-2]proPSA, PHI- and PSA-density were the strongest predictors. In conclusion, due to heterogeneity of time spans to biochemical recurrence, longer follow up periods are crucial. This study with a median follow up of more than 5 years, confirmed a clinical value for PHI as an independent biomarker essential for biochemical recurrence prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maxeiner et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: