Key result
Higher PHI links to adverse pathology, while PHI density carries ~54% greater grade upgrading risk.
Why the study?
The role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) and PHI density (PHId) in predicting pathological aggressiveness and upgrading at radical prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer requires further elucidation.
Do PHI and PHId predict adverse pathological features and ISUP upgrading in men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
Observational (n=130)
No
Do PHI and PHId predict adverse pathological features and ISUP upgrading in men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
PHI and PHId provide complementary information in localized prostate cancer, with PHI predicting adverse pathological extension and PHId capturing the probability of grade reclassification.
PHI/PHId associated with upgrading and adverse features at RP; leaves open whether they refine preoperative risk models in prospective cohorts.
Background The Prostate Health Index (PHI) has emerged as a promising biomarker for improving prostate cancer (PCa) detection. However, its role in predicting pathological aggressiveness at radical prostatectomy (RP) requires further elucidation. We aimed to assess the ability of PHI and PHI density (PHId) to predict adverse pathological features and ISUP upgrading in men undergoing robot-assisted RP. Methods We conducted a prospective, single-center observational study including 130 patients who underwent RP. Total PSA, free PSA, and p2PSA were measured using the Access 2 platform, and PHI and PHId were calculated accordingly. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the association of PSA, PSA density, PHI, and PHId with two predefined endpoints: (i) adverse pathological features (pT ≥3 and/or pN1), and (ii) upgrading from biopsy to RP. Models were adjusted for DRE status, PI-RADS score, and biopsy ISUP grade. Discrimination was assessed using AUC and the DeLong test. Results Median PSA, PHI, PSA density, and PHId were 6.21 ng/mL, 58, 0.15 ng/mL/cc, and 1.40, respectively. Adverse pathological features were identified in 39% of cases, and upgrading occurred in 59% (after exclusion of biopsy ISUP 5 cases). PHI emerged as the strongest independent predictor of adverse pathology (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02–1.07), yielding the highest model accuracy (AUC 0.86) and showing a sharp risk increase above PHI > 40. PHId was the only marker independently associated with upgrading (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.10–2.29), achieving the best discrimination (AUC 0.83), with risk escalation particularly evident in patients with PI-RADS 4–5 lesions. Conclusions PHI and PHId provide complementary information in localized PCa. PHI accurately identifies patients at risk of adverse pathological extension, whereas PHId effectively captures the probability of grade reclassification at RP. Integrating these biomarkers into patient assessment may support precision-based decision-making and helping to minimize undertreatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terracciano et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Localized prostate cancer (n=130). Prostate Health Index (PHI) and PHI density vs. PSA and PSA density was evaluated on Adverse pathological features (pT ≥3 and/or pN1) (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, p=<0.001). Higher Prostate Health Index (PHI) independently predicted adverse pathological features (OR 1.04), while PHI density was independently associated with grade upgrading (OR 1.54) in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: