Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sixteen lymphoid cell lines were derived from patients with undifferentiated lymphoma of Burkitt's or non-Burkitt's type. They were obtained directly from tumor biopsies, from serous effusions, or from bone marrow. In 10 of the cell lines, the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen (EBNA) was undetectable; the remaining 6 lines were EBNA-positive (EB-pos). Of the 16 lines, 15 were aneuploid, with detectable chromosome "14q+ markers (11 had +8;14 translocations). These 15 lines, which included the EBNA-negative (EB-neg) lines, were believed to be of tumor cell origin. The remaining line consisted predominantly of diploid cells derived from normal lymphocytes, but some cells of tumor origin were present. Four EB-pos cell lines derived from EB-neg tumors had an aneuploid karyotype consistent with an origin from tumor cells (including no.8;14 translocation in two), which suggested that either tumor cells were infected with EBV in vitro or a tiny fraction of EB-pos tumor cells (or potential tumor cells) present in vivo gave rise to the predominant cell of the line. EB-neg B-cell lines and EB-pos cell lines established from undifferentiated lymphomas differed greatly. EB-neg lines had consistently smaller electronic mean cell volumes and narrow-angle light scatter than did EB-pos lines. This finding correlated with a lower nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio in EB-pos lines. EB-neg lines also had higher saturation cell densities than did EB-pos lines under standard culture conditions. The data indicate either that EBV influences the morphologic and physiologic characteristics of lymphoid cell lines or that EB-neg B-cell lines and EB-pos cell lines are derived ultimately from different lymphocyte subpopulations or that both may apply.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magrath et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: