Why the study?
Peri-coronary inflammation independently predicts cardiovascular risk in the general population, but whether it is increased or changes over time has not been studied in people with HIV and active HCV co-infection.
Does HIV or HIV/HCV co-infection increase peri-coronary inflammation measured by FAI on CCTA compared to matched controls?
Does HIV or HIV/HCV co-infection increase peri-coronary inflammation measured by FAI on CCTA compared to matched controls?
While baseline peri-coronary inflammation by FAI is not elevated in PWH compared to controls, it significantly progresses over time, suggesting FAI may be useful for tracking asymptomatic CVD progression in this population.
OBJECTIVE: People with HIV (PWH) and co-infected with hepatitis C virus (PWH + HCV) have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Peri-coronary inflammation, measured by fat attenuation index (FAI) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), independently predicts cardiovascular risk in the general population but has not been studied in the PWH + HCV population. We tested whether peri-coronary inflammation is increased in PWH or PWH + HCV, and whether inflammation changes over time. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis to determine FAI differences among groups. Longitudinal analysis in PWH to assess changes in inflammation over time. METHODS: Age-matched and sex-matched seropositive groups (PWH and PWH + HCV) virologically suppressed on antiretroviral therapy, HCV viremic, and without prior CVD and matched controls underwent CCTA. Peri-coronary FAI was measured around the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) and left anterior descending artery (LAD). Follow-up CCTA was performed in 22 PWH after 20.6-27.4 months. RESULTS: A total of 101 participants (48 women) were studied (60 PWH, 19 PWH + HCV and 22 controls). In adjusted analyses, peri-coronary FAI did not differ between seropositive groups and controls. Low attenuation coronary plaque was significantly less common in seropositive groups compared with controls (LAD, P = 0.035; and RCA, P = 0.017, respectively). Peri-coronary FAI values significantly progressed between baseline and follow-up in PWH (RCA: P = 0.001, LAD: P = <0.001). CONCLUSION: PWH and PWH + HCV without history of CVD do not have significantly worse peri-coronary inflammation, assessed by FAI, compared with matched controls. However, peri-coronary inflammation in mono-infected PWH significantly increased over approximately 22 months. FAI measures may be an important imaging biomarker for tracking asymptomatic CVD progression in PWH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: