This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Zellner's g prior remains a popular conventional prior for use in Bayesian variable selection, despite several undesirable consistency issues. In this article we study mixtures of g priors as an alternative to default g priors that resolve many of the problems with the original formulation while maintaining the computational tractability that has made the g prior so popular. We present theoretical properties of the mixture g priors and provide real and simulated examples to compare the mixture formulation with fixed g priors, empirical Bayes approaches, and other default procedures. Please see Arnold Zellner's letter and the author's response.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: