Why the study?
The study was designed to assess the impact of e-health interventions on disease management in patients with chronic heart failure.
Do e-health interventions reduce mortality and hospitalizations in patients with chronic heart failure?
Do e-health interventions reduce mortality and hospitalizations in patients with chronic heart failure?
E-health interventions in patients with chronic heart failure significantly reduce all-cause mortality and hospitalizations while improving quality of life and self-management.
E-health interventions improve CHF outcomes; supports clinical integration and extends evidence for scalable remote management.
Objective The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the impact of e-health interventions on disease management in patients with CHF. Methods Six databases including Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, and EBSCO were searched by computer. The search time is before May 1, 2022. Odds ratios (OR) were used for binary categorical data and weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous variables. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to express the effect sizes for both count and measurement data. RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0 were employed to complete this meta-analysis. Results The study included 22 research studies and 5,149 patients. e-health intervention can effectively reduce all-cause mortality [OR = 0.801, 95%CI: (0.650, 0.987), P < 0.05], all-cause hospitalization rate [OR = 0.66, 95%CI: (0.46, 0.95), P < 0.05] and heart failure related hospitalization rate [OR = 0.750, 95%CI: (0.632, 0.891), P < 0.05]. e-health intervention is also effective in improving the quality of life [WMD = 2.97, 95%CI: (1.54, 4.40), P < 0.05] and the self-management ability of patients [WMD = −2.76, 95%CI: (−5.52, −0.11), P < 0.05]. Conclusion e-health interventions can reduce all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and heart failure-related hospitalization in patients with CHF. Furthermore, it can improve the health-related quality of life of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: