Key result
Hypertension is linked to ~90% higher risk of cardiovascular events in multiple myeloma.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular events in patients with multiple myeloma impair treatment continuity and increase mortality, requiring identification of multivariable predictors to support risk stratification and cardio-oncology management.
What demographic, clinical, treatment-related, and biomarker factors predict cardiovascular events in adult patients with multiple myeloma?
Meta-Analysis (n=130,000)
Yes
What demographic, clinical, treatment-related, and biomarker factors predict cardiovascular events in adult patients with multiple myeloma?
Hazard Ratio: 1.9 (95% CI 1.57–2.29)
This systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis demonstrates that cardiovascular risk in multiple myeloma is multifactorial—driven by pre-existing hypertension, proteasome inhibitor exposure (particularly carfilzomib), and dynamic natriuretic peptide elevations—highlighting the need for standardized cardio-oncology risk stratification.
Supports prioritizing blood pressure monitoring in cardio-oncology risk stratification; leaves open whether intensive antihypertensive therapy reduces events given observational, moderate-bias evidence.
Background Novel therapies have significantly improved survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but cardiovascular (CV) events have become a major challenge, impairing treatment continuity and increasing mortality. This systematic review aimed to identify predictors of CV events in MM to support risk stratification and cardio-oncology management. Methods This review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251084727). Five electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2025. Studies reporting multivariable predictors of CV events in MM were included. Methodological quality was assessed using QUIPS tool. Results Eleven studies were included, comprising nine retrospective cohort studies, one prospective observational study, one case-control study. Overall, most studies were judged to be at moderate risk of bias. A total of 20 candidate predictors of CV events were identified. Among these, six were reported in at least two studies, but only hypertension had sufficiently comparable adjusted effect estimates for exploratory meta-analysis. Among treatment-related factors, carfilzomib-based therapy and longer duration of proteasome-inhibitor treatment were associated with a higher risk of CV event in individual studies. Limited evidence from a single prospective study suggests that dynamic natriuretic peptide assessment may have prognostic value, with elevation of natriuretic peptides during the first treatment cycle showing a stronger predictive value (HR 9.5) compared to baseline elevation alone (HR 4.1). Conclusions CV risk in MM appears to be multifactorial, involving both pre-existing vulnerability and treatment-related toxicity. Although several candidate predictors have been identified, the current evidence remains limited by heterogeneity and methodological weaknesses. Larger prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these predictors and to define standardized CV risk assessment and surveillance strategies in MM. Systematic Review Registration identifier CRD420251084727.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Multiple myeloma (n=130,000). Hypertension vs. Absence of hypertension was evaluated on Composite cardiovascular adverse events (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.57-2.29). Hypertension was associated with a higher risk of composite cardiovascular adverse events in patients with multiple myeloma (pooled HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.57-2.29).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: