Why the study?
While photoplethysmography detects atrial fibrillation, its use for classifying multiclass arrhythmias has rarely been reported.
Does a deep convolutional neural network using photoplethysmography signals accurately classify multiclass arrhythmias compared to cardiologist ECG interpretation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation?
Does a deep convolutional neural network using photoplethysmography signals accurately classify multiclass arrhythmias compared to cardiologist ECG interpretation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation?
A deep convolutional neural network can accurately classify six types of arrhythmias using photoplethysmography signals, offering potential for population-based screening and long-term surveillance.
Supports further PPG-based arrhythmia research; leaves open larger prospective validation before any clinical consideration.
Background Studies have reported the use of photoplethysmography signals to detect atrial fibrillation; however, the use of photoplethysmography signals in classifying multiclass arrhythmias has rarely been reported. Our study investigated the feasibility of using photoplethysmography signals and a deep convolutional neural network to classify multiclass arrhythmia types. Methods and Results ECG and photoplethysmography signals were collected simultaneously from a group of patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation for arrhythmias. A deep convolutional neural network was developed to classify multiple rhythms based on 10-second photoplethysmography waveforms. Classification performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the microaverage receiver operating characteristic curve, overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values against annotations on the rhythm of arrhythmias provided by 2 cardiologists consulting the ECG results. A total of 228 patients were included; 118 217 pairs of 10-second photoplethysmography and ECG waveforms were used. When validated against an independent test data set (23 384 photoplethysmography waveforms from 45 patients), the DCNN achieved an overall accuracy of 85.0% for 6 rhythm types (sinus rhythm, premature ventricular contraction, premature atrial contraction, ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, and atrial fibrillation); the microaverage area under the microaverage receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.978; the average sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 75.8%, 96.9%, 75.2%, and 97.0%, respectively. Conclusions This study demonstrated the feasibility of classifying multiclass arrhythmias from photoplethysmography signals using deep learning techniques. The approach is attractive for population-based screening and may hold promise for the long-term surveillance and management of arrhythmia. Registration URL: www.chictr.org.cn. Identifier: ChiCTR2000031170.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: