Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using synchrotron-generated vacuum-ultraviolet radiation and multiplexed time-resolved photoionization mass spectrometry we have measured the absolute photoionization cross-section for the propargyl (C3H3) radical, σ _ propargyl^ ion (E)σ propargyl ion (E), relative to the known absolute cross-section of the methyl (CH3) radical. We generated a stoichiometric 1:1 ratio of C3H3 : CH3 from 193 nm photolysis of two different C4H6 isomers (1-butyne and 1,3-butadiene). Photolysis of 1-butyne yielded values of σ _ propargyl^ ion ( 10.213\; eV) = (26.1 ± 4.2)σ propargyl ion (10.213 eV )=(26.1±4.2) Mb and σ _ propargyl^ ion ( 10.413\; eV) = (23.4 ± 3.2)σ propargyl ion (10.413 eV )=(23.4±3.2) Mb, whereas photolysis of 1,3-butadiene yielded values of σ _ propargyl^ ion ( 10.213\; eV) = (23.6 ± 3.6)σ propargyl ion (10.213 eV )=(23.6±3.6) Mb and σ _ propargyl^ ion ( 10.413\; eV) = (25.1 ± 3.5)σ propargyl ion (10.413 eV )=(25.1±3.5) Mb. These measurements place our relative photoionization cross-section spectrum for propargyl on an absolute scale between 8.6 and 10.5 eV. The cross-section derived from our results is approximately a factor of three larger than previous determinations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savee et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: