Why the study?
Is a pulmonary artery-to-ascending aorta ratio ≥ 1.0 associated with increased risk of cardiovascular hospitalization and death in patients referred for cardiac MRI?
Is a pulmonary artery-to-ascending aorta ratio ≥ 1.0 associated with increased risk of cardiovascular hospitalization and death in patients referred for cardiac MRI?
A PA-to-Ao ratio ≥ 1.0 on cardiac MRI is an independent predictor of cardiovascular hospitalization and death, suggesting it should be routinely reported.
Suggests routine reporting of this simple metric may improve risk stratification on cardiac MRI; leaves open whether.
Purpose To investigate whether the pulmonary artery (PA)–to–ascending aorta (Ao) ratio is associated with outcome in unselected patients referred for cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Materials and Methods This study prospectively enrolled 650 consecutive patients (47.2% women; mean age, 56.1 years ± 17.7 [standard deviation]). Diameters of PA and Ao were measured in axial black blood images. On the basis of previous results, a PA-to-Ao ratio of 1.0 or greater was chosen as the cutoff for further analysis. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to investigate the primary end point, which was defined as a composite of cardiovascular hospitalization and death. Results A PA-to-Ao ratio of 1.0 or greater was present in 131 (20.2%) patients. Patients with a PA-to-Ao ratio of 1.0 or greater were predominantly women (P = .010); more frequently presented with atrial fibrillation (P < .001), diabetes (P < .001), and impaired renal function (P < .001); and had higher N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (P < .001), larger left (P = .023) and right ventricles (RV; P = .002), and worse RV function (P < .001). Patients were followed for 17.8 months ± 12.9, during which 110 patients (16.9%) reached the primary end point. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, event-free survival was significantly worse in patients with a PA-to-Ao ratio of 1.0 or greater (log-rank test, P < .001). A PA-to-Ao ratio of 1.0 or greater was independently associated with outcome by multivariable Cox regression analysis, in addition to age, NT-proBNP serum levels, and RV size. Conclusion A PA-to-Ao ratio of 1.0 or greater identified patients at risk, most likely because of elevated PA pressures. On the basis of these results, the PA-to-Ao ratio should routinely be reported at cardiac MR imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kammerlander et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: