Why the study?
How should chest pain be evaluated in athletes to accurately diagnose cardiac disease such as angina pectoris?
How should chest pain be evaluated in athletes to accurately diagnose cardiac disease such as angina pectoris?
A structured diagnostic approach is essential for athletes with chest pain to differentiate benign causes from serious cardiac conditions like hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or angina.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Structured evaluation remains prudent for athletes with suspected angina; leaves open prospective validation of protocols.
In brief Most chest pain in athletes is brief noncardiac, and it resolves spontaneously or with appropriately directed treatment. But when the patient's medical history suggests angina pectoris, accurate diagnosis of cardiac disease is imperative. If cardiac examination suggests an organic heart murmur in conjunction with angina, or a resting ECG reveals inappropriate left ventricular hypertrophy, Q waves, or repolarization variations, echocardiography should be done to detect hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A standard exercise ECG is also valuable, though a thallium stress scan may be necessary to exclude a false-positive treadmill test. If these tests are inconclusive, medication trials and other diagnostic tests can help determine the athlete's source of pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John D. Cantwell (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: