Why the study?
Does home-based exercise training improve exercise capacity and self-efficacy in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does home-based exercise training improve exercise capacity and self-efficacy in patients with chronic heart failure?
Home-based exercise training offers short-term benefits in exercise capacity and self-efficacy for patients with chronic heart failure, serving as a potential alternative or adjunct to center-based programs.
May support home-based training as adjunct in chronic HF; leaves open long-term durability and optimal protocols.
Objective: In view of the growing incidence of chronic heart failure (CHF) and its poor prognosis, there has been increasing interest in optimising management of people with this condition. Exercise has been widely accepted as part of the management plan for patients with CHF. Traditionally, exercise training for this group of patients has concentrated on supervised centre-based training. However, home-based training may offer an alternative to conventional training or a means of maintaining physical fitness after graduating from the centre-based training. This review was undertaken to examine the literature for home-based exercise training in patients with CHF. Methods: Literature searches were performed initially using electronic databases. The obtained papers were cross-referenced and appropriate articles were ordered through interlibrary loans. Results: A total of 21 relevant papers were identified for review. The majority of studies documented benefits with home-based training including increased exercise capacity, improved self-efficacy and increased muscle strength. Conclusions: Home-based exercise training has been shown to benefit people with CHF in the short term. Further research is required to investigate the long-term effects of home exercise and to determine the optimal strategies for improving exercise adherence in patients with CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: