Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report in detail on searches for eV-scale sterile neutrinos, in the context of a 3+1 model, using eight years of data from the IceCube Neutrino Telescope. By analyzing the reconstructed energies and zenith angles of 305,735 atmospheric νμ and ¯νμ events we construct confidence intervals in two analysis spaces: sin2(2θ₂₄) vs Δm2¦41 under the conservative assumption θ₃₄=0; and sin² (2θ₂₄) vs sin² (2θ₃₄) given sufficiently large Δm2¦41 that fast oscillation features are unresolvable. Detailed discussions of the event selection, systematic uncertainties, and fitting procedures are presented. No strong evidence for sterile neutrinos is found, and the best-fit likelihood is consistent with the no sterile neutrino hypothesis with a p value of 8% in the first analysis space and 19% in the second.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aartsen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: