Why the study?
CYP2C19 polymorphisms impact clopidogrel efficacy, but their association along with platelet reactivity on ischemic and bleeding risks in AF patients undergoing PCI on OAC and clopidogrel needed evaluation.
Does CYP2C19 poor/intermediate metabolizer status or altered platelet reactivity increase the risk of ischemic or bleeding events in patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation undergoing PCI?
Does CYP2C19 poor/intermediate metabolizer status or altered platelet reactivity increase the risk of ischemic or bleeding events in patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation undergoing PCI?
In patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI on oral anticoagulation and clopidogrel, CYP2C19 loss-of-function status did not significantly increase ischemic risk, but functional assessment showing low platelet reactivity correlated with an increased risk of major bleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No support for CYP2C19 genotyping in AF-PCI on OAC plus clopidogrel; leaves open platelet reactivity testing for bleeding risk.
CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms impact the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel and associate with ischemic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to evaluate the association of CYP2C19 and platelet reactivity (PR) with these risks, in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing PCI, treated with an oral anticoagulation (OAC) and clopidogrel. This two-center prospective cohort study included patients with AF and OAC undergoing PCI. Carriers of ≥ 1 loss-of-function (LOF) allele were classified as poor/intermediate metabolizers (PM/IM), whereas carriers of ≥ 1 gain-of-function allele without LOF alleles were classified as rapid metabolizers (RM). PR was assessed by thromboelastography (TEG) and/or multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA). The primary outcome included death, MI, or stroke at 6 months ±2 weeks; the secondary outcome consisted of non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) or major bleeding. Among 283 patients (median age 78 years; 72% male), 73 (26%) were PM/IM, 108 (38%) were NM, and 102 (36%) were RM. PM/IM status was not significantly associated with the primary ischemic outcome (PM/IM: 6 [8.2%] vs. NM + RM: 16 [7.6%], p = 0.869), but any bleeding rates were numerically lower. While there was a trend for association of high platelet reactivity (HPR) with the ischemic outcome (OR 2.005 [95% CI 0.820-4.902], p = 0.127), low platelet reactivity (LPR) was associated with major bleeding (OR 2.646 [95% CI 1.075-6.509], p = 0.034). PM/IM status did not detect an increased ischemic risk but might, however, protect from bleeding risk in AF patients undergoing PCI. HPR might indicate a higher ischemic risk, while LPR was associated with major bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: