Why the study?
Women face higher complication risks during percutaneous coronary or valvular interventions, but the impact of gender on LAAO outcomes is not well characterized.
Are there gender-related differences in procedural and long-term outcomes following left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Are there gender-related differences in procedural and long-term outcomes following left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation?
LAAO using the Amplatzer Amulet device is equally safe and effective for stroke prevention in both men and women with atrial fibrillation.
No gender differences seen in LAAO success or outcomes; supports equitable use but leaves open need for larger confirmatory trials.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous LAAO represents an alternative for stroke prevention in patients not tolerating anticoagulation. While women are at higher risk of complications during percutaneous coronary or valvular interventions, the impact of gender on LAAO outcomes is not well characterized. The current study assessed potential gender-related differences in procedural and long-term outcomes following left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). METHODS: 1088 AF patients were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter, Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Observational Study and followed for 2 years with scheduled adverse event assessments. The prespecified primary outcome was ischemic stroke, systemic embolism or cardiovascular (CV) death at 2 years. We also compared the rate of procedural success, device-related thrombus (DRT) and major bleeding between genders. RESULTS: -VASc predicted rate, we observed a numerically greater absolute risk reduction of ischemic stroke in women (from 7.6 to 2.1%/year) than men (from 6.2 to 2.2%/year). DRT through 2 years was similar between groups (1.6%, p = 0.96). We found no significant gender difference in terms of periprocedural or long-term (7.1 vs 7.6%/year) major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: In this large group of patients undergoing LAAO using the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device we found no significant gender difference in terms of procedural or long-term clinical outcomes. Similarly to oral anticoagulation, device-based LAA occlusion renders AF-related stroke risk similar in women and men. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02447081.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02447081.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caterina et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: