Why the study?
While dozens of reviews have surveyed deep learning approaches to ECG analysis, they rarely address the field's full scope.
Do artificial intelligence algorithms improve diagnostic accuracy for atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and coronary artery disease in ECG analysis?
Do artificial intelligence algorithms improve diagnostic accuracy for atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and coronary artery disease in ECG analysis?
Convolutional neural networks provide high diagnostic accuracy for detecting AF, MI, and CAD from ECGs, highlighting the potential of AI in continuous cardiac monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support CNN selection for ECG-based AF detection; extends meta-analyses of AI diagnostics while leaving MI/CAD performance open to prospective trials.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) record the heart’s electrical activity and is vital for continuous cardiac monitoring. While dozens of reviews have surveyed deep learning approaches to ECG analysis, they rarely address the field’s full scope. Here, we systematically review 2,990 ECG studies published over the past decade and perform a meta-analysis on 58 articles evaluating algorithmic performance for atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial infarction (MI), and coronary artery disease (CAD). A literature-based knowledge map highlights machine learning and deep learning as dominant research trends. Our meta-analysis reveals that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) deliver the highest diagnostic accuracy for AF, MI, and CAD, though efficacy diminishes across those conditions. We also explore emerging methods, including large language models, and conclude by discussing outstanding challenges and future directions in data quality and diversity, model generalizability, clinical integration, and novel technology adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: