Why the study?
Do cardioselective beta-blockers have a favorable risk-benefit profile for the treatment of hypertension in patients with asthma?
Do cardioselective beta-blockers have a favorable risk-benefit profile for the treatment of hypertension in patients with asthma?
Routine use of cardioselective beta-blockers for hypertension in patients with asthma should be avoided unless there is a compelling cardiovascular indication.
Supports avoiding higher doses in asthma patients with hypertension; extends evidence on dose-dependent cardioselective beta-blocker tolerability.
BACKGROUND: Benefits outweigh risks of cardioselective beta-blocker therapy in patients with nonsevere asthma and a history of heart failure or myocardial infarction (MI). This review summarizes the risks versus benefits of using cardioselective beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension in patients with asthma. METHODS: We searched the English literature from 1976 to 2011 via PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS using the following search terms: "beta-blocker treatment of hypertension" AND "asthma"; "cardioselective beta-blockers" AND "asthma." When pertinent articles were found, we assessed relevant articles cited in those papers. All studies related to cardioselective beta-blocker use in patients with asthma and hypertension were included. RESULTS: Seven studies with patient populations ranging from 10 to 17 patients evaluated cardioselective beta-blockers in patients with asthma and hypertension. Atenolol and/or immediate-release metoprolol were evaluated in these studies. The duration of beta-blocker therapy in four studies was 1-8 weeks; two studies were single dose and one investigation lasted 8 months. Metoprolol and atenolol were generally well tolerated except at higher doses such as metoprolol >100 mg daily. CONCLUSION: In the absence of concomitant cardiovascular disease, routine use of beta-blockers for the treatment of hypertension in patients with asthma should be avoided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Self et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: