Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of a new regimen of 800 µg misoprostol administered intravaginally every 6 h up to a maximum of three doses in 24 h for second trimester pregnancy termination. METHODS: A total of 66 women seeking termination of second trimester pregnancy (30 fetal structural anomaly, six chromosomal abnormality and 30 fetal death) were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: (i) intravaginal misoprostol moistened with 3 ml of 5% acetic acid in group A (n = 33); or (ii) intravaginal misoprostol moistened with 3 ml of saline in group B (n = 33). RESULTS: The overall median (range) induction–abortion interval was 10 h (2–46) [10 h (4–35) in 36 live fetuses and 9 h (2–46) in 30 dead fetuses, P = 0.515]. All of the patients in both groups aborted within 48 h (100% success rate). The median (range) induction–abortion interval revealed a significantly faster delivery time (P < 0.001) in group A [8 h (2–24)] than in group B [14 h (3–46)]. CONCLUSIONS: This new regimen of 800 µg of vaginal misoprostol every 6 h for a maximum of three doses in 24 h was an effective alternative method for second trimester abortion. In addition, misoprostol moistened with acetic acid was significantly more effective than misoprostol moistened with saline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yılmaz et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: