Why the study?
Chronic coronary syndromes commonly occur without flow-limiting epicardial coronary stenosis, stemming from microvascular disease, spasm, bridging, or diffuse atherosclerosis.
The 2024 ESC guidelines elevate the role of invasive coronary function testing to a Class I recommendation for diagnosing and managing INOCA/ANOCA.
AIMS: Chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) occur commonly in the absence of flow-limiting epicardial coronary stenosis. Ischaemia or angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA/ANOCA) may be caused by coronary microvascular disease, coronary artery spasm, myocardial bridging, diffuse atherosclerosis, or a combination of disorders. METHODS AND RESULTS: We highlight the new recommendations in the 2024 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on CCS relevant to the diagnosis and management of INOCA/ANOCA. The guidelines place a new emphasis on consideration of INOCA/ANOCA early during cardiovascular risk stratification and the initial diagnostic workup for chest pain. There is a new Class I recommendation for the availability of invasive coronary function testing (CFT) at the time of initial coronary angiography, when the mechanisms of chest pain are uncertain after non-invasive testing, and in patients with established INOCA/ANOCA who have persistent symptoms and poor quality of life despite medical therapy. Once underlying disorders have been identified based on the results of invasive CFT, the ESC guidelines emphasize a patient-centred, mechanism-based approach to medical treatment of INOCA/ANOCA to improve the symptoms and quality of life. CONCLUSION: The 2024 ESC CCS guidelines provide a new vision for the diagnosis and management of ANOCA/INOCA, with an expanded role for invasive CFT and targeted medical therapy to improve symptoms and quality of life in patients with angina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reynolds et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: