Why the study?
Diffuse interstitial fibrosis confers adverse outcomes in hypertensive heart disease and may be reversible, with sacubitril/valsartan potentially providing greater anti-fibrotic effects than valsartan alone.
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce interstitial volume compared to valsartan in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy?
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce interstitial volume compared to valsartan in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy?
Sacubitril/valsartan provides a greater reduction in myocardial interstitial volume compared to valsartan alone in patients with hypertensive heart disease, independent of blood pressure lowering.
Phase 2 data on sacubitril/valsartan for LVH fibrosis remain preliminary; leaves open superiority versus valsartan in larger trials.
Diffuse interstitial fibrosis is associated with adverse outcomes in hypertensive heart disease and may be reversible. Sacubitril/valsartan could offer greater anti-fibrotic effects than valsartan alone. In the REVERSE-LVH phase 2 open-labelled trial ( clinicaltrials.gov NCT: 03553810; funded by the National Medical Research Council of Singapore), 78 patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were randomized 1:1 to sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan for 52 weeks. Primary endpoint was a change in interstitial volume, assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Despite similar 24-hour systolic blood pressure at 52 weeks (125±11 vs. 126±11 mmHg; P=0.379), sacubitril/valsartan resulted in a greater absolute reduction in interstitial volume compared to valsartan (−5.2±5.4 vs. −2.5±3.1 mL; P=0.006). Secondary endpoints showed significant differences favoring sacubitril/valsartan in LV mass, left atrial volume, estimated LV filling pressure, and improved cardiac circulating biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin T). Other markers of cardiac volumes, function and mechanics were similar between the two treatment arms. Here we show the potential myocardial benefits of sacubitril/valsartan beyond blood pressure control, though larger studies are needed to confirm their clinical relevance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: