Why the study?
Many SCN5A variants in Brugada syndrome lack functional characterization, and the temperature dependency of SCN5A is rarely explored in vitro.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
A family with symptomatic Brugada syndrome, cardiac conduction disease, and sick sinus syndrome
Comparison
HEK 293T cells expressing Nav1.5-G1712S vs wild type
Design
Clinical family pedigree assessment and in vitro whole-cell patch clamp study
Temperature-sensitive SCN5A loss-of-function may heighten fever-related risk in this family; leaves open broader variant classification and risk stratification.
INTRODUCTION: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited arrhythmia syndrome associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. SCN5A is the most important disease-modifying gene for BrS, but many SCN5A variants have not been functionally characterized. Furthermore, the temperature dependency of SCN5A is only rarely explored in in vitro analyses. METHODS: The clinical phenotype of the affected family was assessed by medical history, ECGs and ajmaline challenge. Whole-cell patch clamp recordings were performed on HEK 293T cells expressing Nav1.5-G1712S, a novel SCN5A variant found in the symptomatic family. RESULTS: Three male family members had experienced sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, and rhythmogenic syncopes. Beside a positive ajmaline challenge with demarcation of a Brugada type 1 ECG, 1 patient also showed evidence of symptomatic cardiac conduction disease and sick sinus syndrome (SSS). In patch clamp analyses, Nav1.5-G1712S generated reduced peak currents as compared to the wild type. At body temperature, Nav1.5-G1712S additionally exhibited an enhanced slow inactivation and an impaired recovery from inactivation. CONCLUSION: We conclude that G1712S is a pathogenic SCN5A loss-of function mutation at physiological temperature associated with an overlapping presentation of BrS, SSS, and cardiac conduction disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanner et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: