Why the study?
Malignant hypertension remains life-threatening despite available antihypertensive drugs, creating a need for new therapeutic strategies to treat the condition and its associated organ damage.
Does the sGC stimulator BAY 41-8543, alone or with empagliflozin, prevent mortality and organ damage in a rat model of malignant hypertension?
Does the sGC stimulator BAY 41-8543, alone or with empagliflozin, prevent mortality and organ damage in a rat model of malignant hypertension?
In a rat model of malignant hypertension, the sGC stimulator BAY 41-8543 prevented mortality and cardiac dysfunction, with no additional benefit observed from adding empagliflozin.
May support trials of sGC stimulators in malignant hypertension; leaves open human translation.
OBJECTIVE: Despite availability of an array of antihypertensive drugs, malignant hypertension remains a life-threatening condition, and new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of malignant hypertension and malignant hypertension-associated organ damage are needed. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of nitric oxide (NO)-independent soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) stimulator on the course of malignant hypertension. The second aim was to investigate if the treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor would augment the expected beneficial actions of the sGC stimulation on the course of malignant hypertension. METHODS: As a model of malignant hypertension, Ren-2 transgenic rats (TGR) treated with nonspecific NO synthase inhibitor (Nω-nitro- l -arginine methyl ester, l -NAME) was used. Blood pressure (BP) was monitored by radiotelemetry, and the treatment was started 3 days before administration of l -NAME. RESULTS: The treatment with sGC stimulator BAY 41-8543, alone or combined with SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin, abolished malignant hypertension-related mortality in TGR receiving l -NAME. These two treatment regimens also prevented BP increases after l -NAME administration in TGR, and even decreased BP below values observed in control TGR, and prevented cardiac dysfunction and malignant hypertension-related morbidity. The treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin did not further augment the beneficial actions of sGC stimulator on the course of malignant hypertension-related mortality. CONCLUSION: The treatment with NO-independent sGC stimulator displayed marked protective actions on the course of malignant hypertension-related mortality and malignant hypertension-related cardiac damage. This suggests that application of sGC stimulator could be a promising therapeutic means for the treatment of malignant hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hüttl et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: