Why the study?
Heart failure therapies remain ineffective particularly with concurrent cardio-renal syndrome, prompting investigation of the sGC stimulator BAY 41-8543 in this setting.
Does sGC stimulator BAY41-8543 improve survival in a rat model of high-output heart failure with cardio-renal syndrome?
Does sGC stimulator BAY41-8543 improve survival in a rat model of high-output heart failure with cardio-renal syndrome?
Treatment with an sGC stimulator improved survival in a rat model of volume-overload heart failure, suggesting potential benefits in heart failure with cardio-renal syndrome.
Preclinical efficacy of sGC stimulation in cardio-renal HF models; leaves open translation to human trials.
Heart failure (HF) has been declared as global pandemic and current therapies are still ineffective, especially in patients that develop concurrent cardio-renal syndrome. Considerable attention has been focused on the nitric oxide (NO)/soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC)/cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of sGC stimulator (BAY41-8543) with the same mode of action as vericiguat, for the treatment of heart failure (HF) with cardio-renal syndrome. As a model, we chose heterozygous Ren-2 transgenic rats (TGR), with high-output heart failure, induced by aorto-caval fistula (ACF). The rats were subjected into three experimental protocols to evaluate short-term effects of the treatment, impact on blood pressure, and finally the long-term survival lasting 210 days. As control groups, we used hypertensive sham TGR and normotensive sham HanSD rats. We have shown that the sGC stimulator effectively increased the survival of rats with HF in comparison to untreated animals. After 60 days of sGC stimulator treatment, the survival was still 50% compared to 8% in the untreated rats. One-week treatment with sGC stimulator increased the excretion of cGMP in ACF TGR (109 ± 28 nnmol/12 h), but the ACE inhibitor decreased it (-63 ± 21 nnmol/12 h). Moreover, sGC stimulator caused a decrease in SBP, but this effect was only temporary (day 0: 117 ± 3; day 2: 108 ± 1; day 14: 124 ± 2 mmHg). These results support the concept that sGC stimulators might represent a valuable class of drugs to battle heart failure especially with cardio-renal syndrome, but further studies are necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gawryś et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: