Why the study?
Does paced breathing at different frequencies reduce steady-state sympathetic outflow and blood pressure in adults?
Does paced breathing at different frequencies reduce steady-state sympathetic outflow and blood pressure in adults?
Slow, deep breathing does not lower arterial pressure by suppressing steady-state sympathetic outflow, challenging previous physiological assumptions.
Paced breathing does not support steady-state BP reduction via sympathetic suppression; leaves open dynamic respiratory-cardiovascular interactions.
In patients with hypertension, volitional slowing of the respiratory rate has been purported to reduce arterial pressure via withdrawal of sympathetic tone. We examined the effects of paced breathing at 7, 14, and 21 breaths/min, with reciprocal changes in tidal volume, on muscle sympathetic nerve activity, forearm blood flow, forearm vascular conductance, and blood pressure in 21 men and women, 8 of whom had modest elevations in systemic arterial pressure. These alterations in breathing frequency and volume did not affect steady-state levels of sympathetic activity, blood flow, vascular conductance, or blood pressure (all P > 0.05), even though they had the expected effect on sympathetic activity within breaths (i.e., increased modulation during low-frequency/high-tidal volume breathing) (P < 0.001). These findings were consistent across subjects with widely varied baseline levels of sympathetic activity (4-fold), mean arterial pressure (78-110 mmHg), and vascular conductance (15-fold), and those who became hypocapnic during paced breathing vs. those who maintained normocapnia. These findings challenge the notion that slow, deep breathing lowers arterial pressure by suppressing steady-state sympathetic outflow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Limberg et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: