Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The influence of assay variation and duration of storage on changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of tau and phosphorylated (P)-tau with time was evaluated in 112 patients with various neurological disorders. METHODS: These patients (aged 66+/-9 years, 52% male), referred to our memory clinic, underwent two spinal taps (mean interval 19 months) and the baseline samples were assayed twice in a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): once after the first spinal tap (A1) and once in a separately stored aliquot (A2) simultaneous with the follow-up sample (B). RESULTS: Coefficients of variances (CVs) of tau and P-tau levels determined in repeated spinal taps (DeltaB-A2) measured in one assay (10.9% and 7.6%) were lower (p<0.01) than the CVs observed in two different (DeltaB-A1) assays (16.5% and 11.7%). The CVs of tau and P-tau measurement of one CSF sample repeated on two occasions (DeltaA1-A2) were 12.3% and 8.6%. A difference in mean P-tau level was found if the same CSF samples were repeatedly measured in two different ELISAs (A1-A2). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal CSF tau and P-tau are best measured in one assay resulting in a lower variability compared to measurement in two different assays. The within person variability in levels of these markers currently limits the use of these ELISAs in a longitudinal clinical setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verwey et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: