Explores classification accuracy of Alzheimer’s disease using federated learning across sites, suggesting improvements in data privacy.
Federated learning (FL) lets institutions train shared models without moving raw data, attractive for clinical electroencephalography (EEG), where cohorts are small and privacy-sensitive. Two obstacles persist: clinical sites record EEG with different electrode montages, so input feature spaces differ and standard aggregation fails; and because one recording yields thousands of epochs, splitting epochs rather than subjects leaks subject identity and inflates accuracy. We present MontageFL, a montage-agnostic pipeline that maps any electrode configuration to a fixed 88-dimensional feature vector through region-based aggregation of spectral and covariance features, letting a 19-channel and an 11-channel site train together. Benchmarking centralized, local, FedAvg, and FedProx training for Alzheimer’s disease versus healthy-control classification (Miltiadous et al. dataset; 65 subjects) under strictly subject-level, leakage-free evaluation, subject-level accuracy reached approximately 74% (19-channel) and 89% (11-channel), with no detected difference between federated and local models (FedProx versus local, \(-1.8\) pp; 95% CI \([-6.3, +2.7]\) ), consistent with parity but unable to exclude a modest effect given the small cohort. Evaluated with epoch-level splitting, the same pipeline scored 15–30 points higher, illustrating leakage-driven inflation. Because montage heterogeneity was simulated by channel subsetting within one acquisition system, validation on independent recording hardware remains future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: