Scoping review assesses digital traceability for food fraud prevention, highlighting gaps and implementation challenges.
Background: Global food supply chains have become increasingly complex, sourcing ingredients from multiple countries and intermediaries, creating opportunities for fraud, adulteration, and mislabeling that may compromise consumer safety and market confidence. Digital traceability technologies have been suggested as potential countermeasures, but there is little concrete evidence of their impact in practice. This research presents an assessment of the maturity and effectiveness of these technologies, identifies implementation barriers and security/privacy concerns, and maps research gaps/future directions. Methods: A scoping review of 64 studies from 2023 to 2026 with data extracted from the Scopus and IEEE databases was carried out according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and a structured pre-specified data extraction framework. Results: The field is empirically immature, with none of the reviewed solutions offering a provably correct, adversarially tested solution to the oracle problem. There is a lack of alignment between on-chain immutability and GDPR right to erasure and an unequal burden of implementation costs imposed on smallholder producers. Conclusions: A gradual implementation of traceability regulations, along with cost-of-ownership models and harmonized certification measures that do not disadvantage smaller producers are proposed. Finally, field trials, adversarial testing and reporting results in a standardized format, capturing detection performance and implementation costs, are essential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: