Key result
Rivaroxaban linked to lower adverse event rates vs. warfarin in Kawasaki disease with giant aneurysms.
Why the study?
Long-term anticoagulation is standard for children with giant coronary artery aneurysms after Kawasaki disease, but evidence comparing rivaroxaban with warfarin remains limited.
Does rivaroxaban improve adverse cardiovascular events and coronary artery thrombosis outcomes compared to warfarin in children with giant coronary artery aneurysms after Kawasaki disease?
Observational (n=30)
Yes
Does rivaroxaban improve adverse cardiovascular events and coronary artery thrombosis outcomes compared to warfarin in children with giant coronary artery aneurysms after Kawasaki disease?
Rivaroxaban showed descriptively similar efficacy and safety to warfarin for 6-month thromboprophylaxis in children with giant coronary artery aneurysms after Kawasaki disease, though larger prospective studies are needed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Similar event rates suggest rivaroxaban as potential alternative; leaves open need for randomized trials before changing practice in pediatric giant aneurysms.
Children with giant coronary artery aneurysms (gCAA) after Kawasaki disease (KD) are at high risk of coronary artery thrombosis (CAT), associated with adverse cardiovascular events (ACEs). Long-term anticoagulation is the standard regimen, but evidence comparing rivaroxaban with warfarin in gCAA after KD remains limited. We performed a retrospective observational study at 2 pediatric centers from 2020 to 2025, enrolling children with gCAA after KD. Participants received rivaroxaban or warfarin. The primary efficacy assessment included ACEs and CAT outcomes within 6 months. CAA changes and safety outcomes were assessed. The final cohort included 30 patients, 14 treated with rivaroxaban and 16 with warfarin. ACEs were infrequent, occurring in 1 patient (7.1%) receiving rivaroxaban and 2 patients (12.5%) receiving warfarin. Among patients without CAT at baseline, new-onset CAT occurred in 1 of 10 patients (10.0%) receiving rivaroxaban and 1 of 12 patients (8.3%) receiving warfarin. Among patients with CAT at baseline, CAT resolved in 2 of 4 patients in each group. CAA progression was observed in 7 patients (50.0%) in the rivaroxaban group and 10 patients (62.5%) in the warfarin group, whereas CAA regression occurred in 6 patients (42.9%) and 5 patients (31.2%), respectively. No major bleeding or prespecified severe hypersensitivity events were observed in either group. Over the 6-month follow-up, ACEs, CAT outcomes, CAA changes, and safety outcomes were descriptively similar among children receiving rivaroxaban or warfarin. These descriptive findings require confirmation in larger prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study conducted an observational in Giant coronary artery aneurysms after Kawasaki disease (n=30). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Adverse cardiovascular events (ACEs) at 6 months. In children with giant coronary artery aneurysms after Kawasaki disease, adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 7.1% of those receiving rivaroxaban and 12.5% of those receiving warfarin over 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: