Home Versus Clinic Blood Pressure Monitoring in Women with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Figure 1. Study flow diagram—selection process for included studies.

Figure 2. Risk of bias summary. Included randomized controlled trials: Chappell et al. (2022) [12], Pealing et al. (2019) [13], Ross-McGill et al. (2000) [14], Tucker et al. (2022) [11]. Green (+), low risk of bias; red (−), high risk of bias; yellow (?), unclear risk of bias.

Figure 3. Rates of preeclampsia. Forest plot comparing home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) with standard of care (SOC). Blue squares represent individual study risk ratios, with square size proportional to study weight; horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The black diamond represents the pooled risk ratio and 95% CI. The vertical line indicates the line of no effect (RR = 1). Included randomized controlled trials: Chappell et al. (2022) [12], Pealing et al. (2019) [13], Tucker et al. (2022) [11].

Figure 4. Combined adverse maternal composite outcomes. Forest plot comparing HBPM with SOC. Blue squares represent individual study risk ratios, with square size proportional to study weight; horizontal lines represent 95% CIs. The black diamond represents the pooled risk ratio and 95% CI. The vertical line indicates the line of no effect (RR = 1). Included randomized controlled trials: Chappell et al. (2022) [12], Pealing et al. (2019) [13], Tucker et al. (2022) [11].

Figure 5. Rates of severe hypertension. Forest plot comparing HBPM with SOC. Blue squares represent individual study risk ratios, with square size proportional to study weight; horizontal lines represent 95% CIs. The black diamond represents the pooled risk ratio and 95% CI. The vertical line indicates the line of no effect (RR = 1). Included randomized controlled trials: Chappell et al. (2022) [12], Tucker et al. (2022) [11].

Figure 6. Rates of emergency delivery for hypertension. Forest plot comparing HBPM with SOC. Blue squares represent individual study risk ratios, with square size proportional to study weight; horizontal lines represent 95% CIs. The black diamond represents the pooled risk ratio and 95% CI. The vertical line indicates the line of no effect (RR = 1). Included randomized controlled trials: Chappell et al. (2022) [12], Pealing et al. (2019) [13], Tucker et al. (2022) [11].

Figure 7. Rates of stillbirth. Included randomized controlled trials: Chappell et al. (2022) [12], Pealing et al. (2019) [13], Tucker et al. (2022) [11].

Figure 8. Rates of small-for-gestational-age babies. Included randomized controlled trials: Chappell et al. (2022) [12], Pealing et al. (2019) [13], Tucker et al. (2022) [11].

Figure 9. Rates of neonatal mortality. Included randomized controlled trials: Chappell et al. (2022) [12], Pealing et al. (2019) [13], Tucker et al. (2022) [11].