Evaluates a new ML/MM–MMGBSA method for protein-ligand binding energy ranking, suggesting effective integration of molecular dynamics simulations.
Machine-learning force fields provide a practical route to introduce quantum-derived potential-energy surfaces into molecular dynamics simulations, but their value in end-point protein–ligand binding energy workflows remains unclear. Here, we developed an OpenMM-based ML/MM–MMGBSA workflow by combining ligand-only mechanically embedded ML/MM hybrid simulations and MMPBSA.py analysis, and evaluated it on 199 protein–ligand complexes from eight targets in the JACS benchmark set. The results showed that the effect of ML/MM sampling on MM/GBSA ranking was strongly target-, MLFF-, and sampling-time-dependent; selected improvements were observed in several systems, but simply extending the production length did not consistently improve end-point ranking. Pairwise sign accuracy analysis further showed that trajectory-based MM/GBSA provided useful ranking performance relative to single-structure Prime MMGBSA, although alchemical RBFE methods remained more robust. Overall, this workflow provides a practical and reproducible framework for integrating ML/MM conformational sampling with end-point binding free-energy estimations, while highlighting the need for MLFFs compatible with broader chemical space and explicit-solvent biomolecular environments, improved hybrid simulation embedding schemes such as electrostatic or polarizable embedding, and better consistency between sampling and scoring models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: