Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 13, 2026German Law JournalOpen Access

Polycontexturality for China’s Legal Development? Contending with Gunther Teubner

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

This Article argues polycontextural law risks neglecting public law's role in social equity in China.

Key Points

  • The aim is to critique Gunther Teubner's polycontextural law model for China's legal development and its implications.
  • Critique World Bank's recommendations for China's private law reform.
  • Analyze the role of public law in addressing social inequality in transitional contexts.
  • Teubner's model privileges private law, undermining public law's importance in social needs.
  • The notion of social exclusion and dejuridification risks in China's transitional society are highlighted.

Cite This Study

A 2026 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7d76172b0e0cff3f63f301https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2026.10228
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Legal diffusion without universalism: China, pragmatic governance, and the pluralisation of the rule of law2026
  2. 2History of Chinese Law: Endogenous Innovation and Reception2026
  3. 3Normative Dualism: A New Interpretation of Chinese Legal Tradition2024
  4. 4Normative Dualism: A New Interpretation of Chinese Legal Tradition2024
  5. 5China’s Path to Modernization and Legal Pluralism: Transplants and the Belt and Road Initiative2025 · 3 citations