Key result
Higher fasting insulin is linked to ~65% increased odds of diastolic dysfunction progression per SD.
Why the study?
Although diabetes is a known driver of HFpEF, whether antecedent hyperinsulinemia drives preclinical diastolic dysfunction progression before overt hyperglycemia was unknown.
Does elevated endogenous insulin and insulin resistance predict progression of diastolic dysfunction in community-dwelling adults?
Cohort (n=1,191)
No
Does elevated endogenous insulin and insulin resistance predict progression of diastolic dysfunction in community-dwelling adults?
Elevated endogenous insulin and insulin resistance independently predict the progression of diastolic dysfunction and long-term mortality, suggesting metabolic dysregulation drives early heart failure pathogenesis.
May aid risk stratification; hypothesis-generating for insulin resistance in diastolic dysfunction progression and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Although diabetes is a known driver of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, whether antecedent hyperinsulinemia drives preclinical diastolic dysfunction (DD) progression before overt hyperglycemia remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated whether elevated endogenous insulin and insulin resistance independently predict longitudinal DD progression and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: In a community-based cohort study, we evaluated 1191 participants from the Olmsted County Heart Function Study (median age, 58.7 [interquartile range, 52.4–66.6 years]) who underwent echocardiography at baseline and after 4 years. Fasting insulin and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance were assessed. The primary end point was DD progression. Secondary outcomes (mortality, heart failure) were assessed in 2030 participants followed for a median of 10.97 (95% CI, 10.90–11.05) years for heart failure and a median of 18.1 (95% CI, 18.0–18.2) years for mortality. RESULTS: DD progression occurred in 7.5% of participants. Baseline fasting insulin and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance strongly predicted progression ( P <0.001). In multivariable analysis, every 1-SD increase in log-transformed insulin was associated with 65% increased odds of progression (odds ratio, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.33–2.07]; P <0.001), adjusting for age, creatinine, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). Similar results were observed for homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (odds ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.34–2.08]; P <0.001). In secondary analyses, elevated insulin independently predicted all-cause (hazard ratio, 1.11 per 1-SD [95% CI, 1.02–1.21]) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.02–1.33]). Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance was similarly predictive of all-cause (hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.03–1.20]) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.02–1.32]). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated endogenous insulin and insulin resistance are predictors of progressive DD and long-term mortality, even after accounting for body mass index. Metabolic dysregulation may drive myocardial stiffening before diabetes onset, identifying a potential early therapeutic window for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study conducted a cohort in Community-dwelling adults at risk for diastolic dysfunction (n=1,191). Elevated endogenous insulin and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) vs. Lower endogenous insulin and insulin resistance was evaluated on Progression of diastolic dysfunction (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.33-2.07, p=<0.001). Every 1-SD increase in log-transformed fasting insulin was associated with a 65% increased odds of diastolic dysfunction progression over 4 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: