Evaluates antibacterial and cytocompatibility effects of ZnO nanoparticles in dental applications, suggesting eco-friendly alternatives.
Dental caries remains a major global oral health problem primarily associated with the biofilm-forming bacterium Streptococcus mutans . Conventional antimicrobial agents often exhibit limited biofilm penetration and may induce resistance, highlighting the need for sustainable nanomaterial-based alternatives with enhanced antibacterial efficacy and biocompatibility. In this study, zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) were successfully synthesized via a green approach using Physalis angulata Linn. leaf extract as a multifunctional bioreductor and stabilizing agent. The novelty of this work lies in the first utilization of P. angulata leaf extract for concentration-dependent biosynthesis of ZnONPs integrated with comprehensive phytochemical profiling and biological evaluation. LC–HRMS analysis identified amino acids, organic acids, and nitrogen-containing metabolites that are likely involved in nanoparticle formation and stabilization. ZnONPs were synthesized using 15% and 25% extract concentrations and characterized by UV–Vis, FTIR, XRD, FESEM, TEM, EDX, and PSA–DLS analyses. The nanoparticles exhibited a highly crystalline hexagonal wurtzite structure with quasi-spherical morphology. Increasing extract concentration improved nanoparticle uniformity, colloidal stability, and surface functionalization while reducing particle size from approximately 23.65–42.77 nm to 16.99–29.90 nm. ZnONPs synthesized with 25% extract demonstrated superior antioxidant activity (IC₅₀ = 296.1 ppm), lower toxicity in the Brine Shrimp Lethality Test (IC₅₀ = 1.17 × 10⁵ ppm), and higher fibroblast viability (>88%). Both ZnONPs formulations completely inhibited S. mutans growth. Overall, P. angulata -mediated ZnONPs represent promising eco-friendly nanomaterials with excellent antibacterial activity, favorable biocompatibility, and potential applications in biomedical and oral antimicrobial therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fitriani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: