Retrospective study evaluates perioperative, postoperative, and allograft outcomes in kidney transplantation across donor types, indicating strong results.
Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) is increasingly adopted, but reports describing large-volume programs with predominantly deceased-donor transplantation, increasing procedural complexity, and experience across both single-port (SP) and multiport (MP) robotic platforms remain limited. In this retrospective, single-center study, we reviewed a prospectively maintained registry of patients who underwent RAKT between October 2019 and December 2025 and evaluated perioperative, postoperative, and allograft outcomes. A total of 228 patients underwent RAKT, including 125 (54.8%) deceased-donor kidney transplants (DDKT) and 103 (45.2%) living-donor kidney transplants (LDKT). SP and MP platforms were utilized in 30.7% and 69.3% of cases, respectively. Six patients received dual-kidney transplants and four underwent simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Annual case volume increased from one procedure in 2019 to 115 procedures in 2025. Median operative times were 3 h 38 min for DDKT and 4 h 6 min for LDKT, with median vascular anastomosis times of 44 and 40 min, respectively. Conversion to open surgery occurred in one patient (0.4%). Median length of stay was four days for DDKT and two days for LDKT. Delayed graft function occurred in 30.4% of DDKT recipients and 4.8% of LDKT recipients; among the 121 recipients with available one-year serum creatinine, median one-year serum creatinine was 1.49 mg/dL and 1.37 mg/dL, respectively. Graft-loss occurred in two DDKT recipients (1.6%) and one LDKT recipient (0.9%), while three deaths (2.4%) occurred after DDKT and one death (0.9%) after LDKT. In this large single-center experience, RAKT was associated with low conversion rates, favorable perioperative outcomes, and good one-year graft function despite increasing procedural complexity, supporting its continued expansion in appropriately selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddiqui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: